Skip to content

“Our Biggest Challenge” New Symphony of Science

4
Share

“Our Biggest Challenge” New Symphony of Science

Home / “Our Biggest Challenge” New Symphony of Science
Blog Symphony of Science

“Our Biggest Challenge” New Symphony of Science

By

Published on October 26, 2012

4
Share

Posted recently, the sixteenth installment of the Symphony of Science project is “Our Biggest Challenge,” a call-to-action about climate change featuring the vocals of Bill Nye, David Attenborough, Richard Alley and, last but not least, our old pal Isaac Asimov. This particular piece makes me take note of how much there was packed into Bill Nye’s programs, which I watched as a kid – there’s a hell of a lot of information, there, told in a very intelligible way. Set to music, it’s pretty neat, too. (I do so miss Carl Sagan in the newer songs, though.)

(Previous posts on the series are collected here.)


Lee Mandelo is a writer, critic, and editor whose primary fields of interest are speculative fiction and queer literature, especially when the two coincide. She can be found on Twitter and her website.

About the Author

Lee Mandelo

Author

Lee Mandelo (he/him) is a writer, scholar, and sometimes-editor whose work focuses on queer and speculative fiction. His recent books include debut novel Summer Sons, a contemporary gay Southern gothic, as well as the novellas Feed Them Silence and The Woods All Black. Mandelo's short fiction, essays, and criticism can be read in publications including Tor.com/Reactor, Post45, Uncanny Magazine, and Capacious; he has also been a past nominee for various awards including the Lambda, Nebula, Goodreads Choice, and Hugo. He currently resides in Louisville and is a doctoral candidate at the University of Kentucky. Further information, interviews, and sundry little posts about current media he's enjoying can be found at leemandelo.com or @leemandelo on socials.
Learn More About Lee
Subscribe
Notify of
Avatar


4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Avatar
lorq
12 years ago

Terrific video! So nicely done.

And I too was always struck by how information-packed the Bill Nye shows were. Far superior to other, earlier science education shows in this regard. Those others were well-intentioned, but a *lot* of air-time was wasted on setting up a story, or elaborate attempts at comedy, or other bells & whistles. (It was a stroke of genius to structure the Bill Nye shows around the idea of channel-surfing. This tripled the pace. A quick blur of static and you would fly to the next segment, which was “already in progress.” There was no throat-clearing: you went straight to the content.)

Avatar
12 years ago

I can confidently predict that this sort of thing will be laughed at in the future much like we laugh at “Reefer Madness” now.

Anthropogenic global warming is an important issue with a lot of scientific information still being gleaned. More importantly, the effects and appropriate response to global warming are complex issues that are not well served by a childish, shallow video.

I will toss in one link – please understand that this link is to an article that is in response to a recent report, not this video. I include it because it’s handy and it provides an introduction to a more nuanced look at some of the issues.

http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/09/28/not_so_hot?page=0,0

Avatar
lorq
12 years ago

Puzzling. The subject of the article linked to in the previous comment is just one report — the DARA report. So in relation to the issue of climate change as a whole, its range is quite narrow. And a central qualifying claim the article itself makes about the issue is: “Global warming is real and man-made, and it needs an effective response.” Precisely the message of the video.

Avatar
12 years ago

lorq@3
I thought I had made it clear (@2) that I wasn’t posting a link to some
general website discussing GW but rather to a particular article – and I included the disclaimer that the article itself was a response to something other than the video (i.e. it had a context.)

The reason for that particular choice of article: Timeliness and an excellent introduction to a more sensible approach to the issues – one that must include cost/benefit analyses.

Lastly, please note that while Lomborg is not a global warming denier – I doubt he would claim that GW is solely “man-made”. From what I can tell, the most responsible position based on the state of the science is that the present warming cycle is “man-exacerbated”.

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined